Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1386 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 16% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-3330 - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
