Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 1112 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$460.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
66.26065773447016%
Multi-Core
3898
55.68571428571428%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |