Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 1826 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 83% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-860 - 42 vs 23 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-860
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
