Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 2055 days older than Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$126.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65471 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1078
72.8870858688303%
Multi-Core
3819
75.16236961228104%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |