Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8150 - 254 vs 250 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65467 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |