Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3413 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 17% better in Apex Legends than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 307 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
307
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |