Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2696 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 147 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 58 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$102.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$102.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1023
45.97752808988764%
Multi-Core
3157
42.33606007777927%
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |