Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1607 v3 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1607 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8320 - 472 vs 450 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65829 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |