Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1080 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 219 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$500
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |