Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2906 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 385 vs 347 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
385
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$324.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$324.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18529 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |