Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1401 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 254 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
254
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$895
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$895 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14473 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |