Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1552 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 13% better in League of Legends than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 179 vs 158 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |