Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1545M v5 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1545M v5 is 552 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-4160T - 244 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 - 35 vs 45 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1545M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |