Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1088 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 227 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$774
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$774 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18074 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |