Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 1274 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 246 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$557.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$557.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |