Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1274 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 131 vs 129 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
FPS
129
98.47328244274809%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$79.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Single-Core
1223
89.01018922852984%
Multi-Core
3828
100%
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |