Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1535M v5 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1535M v5 is 653 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
255
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |