Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2166 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 525 vs 511 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
525
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$290
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18064 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |