Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 is 427 days older than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Pentium G640 - 140 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G640 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Pentium G640 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |