Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 4663 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1280 - 142 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$183.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$183.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |