Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 82 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 187 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$989.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$989.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |