Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1695 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 102 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |