Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1270 - 176 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 58 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$118.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$118.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |