Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 24% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1270 - 199 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$173.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$173.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |