Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v5 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v5 is 245 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Performs up to 5% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 139 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 80 vs 140 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |