Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 3525 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 697 vs 533 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 9 7940HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1200
48.582995951417004%
Multi-Core
3875
33.33046619645622%
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
