Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1551 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 271 vs 270 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
271
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1135
97.17465753424658%
Multi-Core
3460
59.716948567483605%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |