Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3895 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 51% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 139 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
18.099838969404185%
Multi-Core
1875
8.587917372784318%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
