Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2714 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 19% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 216 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 28 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FPS
181
83.79629629629629%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Buy for CA$1,560.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
35.97951344430218%
Multi-Core
1875
17.411087380443867%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |