Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1970 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 116 vs 110 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FPS
110
94.82758620689656%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Buy for CA$175.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65532 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
41.53732446415373%
Multi-Core
1875
39.490311710193765%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |