Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1144 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 45 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 709 vs 611 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |