Buy on Amazon
CA$383.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1260L - 244 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
