Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1124 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Xeon E3-1260L - 84 vs 78 FPS
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
