Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2208 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 151 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i9-12900K
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
