Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2269 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 204 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1260L v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
