Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon E3-1241 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 3182 days newer than Xeon E3-1241 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 491 vs 334 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1241 v3
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1241 v3
Server/Workstation • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
1188
51.36186770428015%
Multi-Core
3802
42.12742382271468%
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
