Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1254 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 80 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E3-1240 - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |