Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3403 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1240 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$425
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |