Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2642 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 249 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1310
42.19001610305958%
Multi-Core
4192
19.200293134246323%
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
