Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 69 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 185 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$659
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |