Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 1695 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 69 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 190 vs 172 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$228.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$228.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |