Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3138 days newer than Xeon E3-1230 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 44% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 472 vs 327 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
