Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 2343 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 44% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1225 - 360 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$709.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
568
41.27906976744186%
Multi-Core
1693
16.129954268292682%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |