Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1885 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon E3-1225 - 203 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |