Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v5 is 1148 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4130 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 80 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1225 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
