Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 222 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$678.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$678.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |