Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 1658 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-965 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 84 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |