Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 2349 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 142 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FPS
122
85.91549295774648%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$297.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$297.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
487
35.187861271676304%
Multi-Core
986
20.56308654848801%
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |