Buy on Amazon
CA$310.41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500T outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500T is 1144 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i5-6500T - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500T
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
Core i5-6500T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$310.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I5 I5-6500T Quad-Core (4 Core) 2.50 Ghz Processor - Socket H4 Lga-1151
Buy for CA$310.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58293 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-6500T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1220L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
487
46.87199230028874%
Multi-Core
986
34.681674287724235%
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500T |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.