Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 is 569 days older than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 6 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
149
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |